今天早上收到朋友的SMS说我上报了，上了联合日报（United Daily），而且是有关张健仁的官司，我的天啊，怎么我又再次曝光在报章上，而且 Pazuzu 跟 Rambo 也有，这次是在法庭上面所提到的。
我很吃惊，为什么突然会被提到，然后朋友都叫我去看报纸，我翻了星洲日报（Sin Chew Jit Poh）没有看到，然后另外的朋友在MSN通知我说＂出名了＂，给我看另外一个朋友的 Blog – Rose Wong，里面正好是今天 The Borneo Post 所刊登的新闻，新闻内的确是有提到我的名字。内容是说证人说那些出现在张健仁部落格的留言＂也许是或也许不是＂张健仁写的。然后说部落格的用户还包括有 Pazuzu、Anonymous、rambochai、jimmychin 和 Responsible Christian Voters。
Yesterday during cross-examination by MP Chong’s counsel Alvin Yong, Johari said comments could be written by the owner of the blog site or its users.
Yong asked: Comments (on Chong’s blog site) would mean that they are written by someone other than Mr Chong, do you agree?
Johari: No. Comments can be written by the owner of the blog site or other users who visit it.
Replying to an almost similar question, the witness said the comments appearing in the Chong Chieng Jen’s blog site “might or might not be written by Chong Chieng Jen”.
He reasoned that the blog site had other users with name IDs like Pazuzu; Anonymous; rambochai; jimmychin, and Responsible Christian Voters.
He said the name ID Anonymous can be the same person or different persons and that a comment always starts with a name ID and always ends with the date and time (of posting).
Sourced from The Borneo Post Online
现在我就在想，是不是等下法庭也要招我们上庭，拜托啦，留言无罪！！！等下有时间我要去翻阅所有报馆的报纸，看看曝光程度到哪里，然后看看内容到底还有在讲些什么。